San francisco, santa clara county moves forward with e-cigarette restrictions « cbs san francisco
SAN FRANCISCO (CBS SF) Smoking e cigarettes is getting harder to do in parts of the Bay Area after the San Francisco and Santa Clara County boards of supervisors approved restrictions on the devices Tuesday.
An ordinance regulating use and sales of electronic cigarettes was unanimously passed in a final vote at the San Francisco Board of Supervisors meeting Tuesday afternoon.
Supervisor Eric Mar sponsored the bill that prohibits use of electronic cigarettes where traditional cigarettes are already banned.
E cigarettes will be treated like other tobacco products and will have sale restrictions and age limitations like their traditional counterparts.
The smoking devices are battery operated and involve inhaling a vaporized liquid that can include nicotine and other substances.
According to Mar, there are potential health risks from the vapors released, and flavors such as grape, peach and chocolate are enticing youths to use the product.
The Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors also took on the issue at their meeting Tuesday, and approved preliminary changes to the county s no smoking policy to include restrictions on e cigarette use and sales where cigarettes are banned, including at county facilities, parks, hospitals, and areas near county buildings, along with apartment buildings, hotels and motels.
The board agreed that there would be restrictions for e cigarette sales similar to those for regular cigarettes.
A more comprehensive ordinance covering e cigarette regulations will be back for a board vote in May.
A staff report compiled for Tuesday s meeting stated, Unfortunately, the rapidly increasing use of e cigarettes threatens to undo much of the social norm change around tobacco.
According to the staff report, while there are no federal regulations yet, over 100 cities and counties across the United States, including more than 40 counties and cities in California, have placed restrictions on the use of e cigarettes.
Supervisor Ken Yeager said he is concerned that the devices are being marketed to young people and have unknown health consequences.
It s harder to know exactly the health impacts on people who inhale the vapors from these e cigarettes, but we know that they are being very much marketed to youth, and that is a great concern given all of the efforts that we have done to discourage people, particularly minors, from smoking, he said at Tuesday s meeting.
Detractors of the e cigarette bans include members of the state chapter of NORML, or the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, and the national Smoke Free Alternatives Trade Association.
The groups are concerned about restrictions on vaporizer use, which would impact medical marijuana and other non tobacco product users.
Supporters of e cigarettes fear medical marijuana users will be forced to smoke outside with cigarette smokers, and that new laws will impact people who use the device to stop cigarette use.
The groups also say there is scarce evidence on the health risks involved with using e cigarettes and that the faux cigarettes may be a safer alternative.
Copyright 2014 by CBS San Francisco and Bay City News Service. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Johnson county supervisors discuss use of e-cigarettes
The Johnson County board of supervisors are taking part in the discussion of e cigarettes, but are focusing on the terminology of what to call the fast rising products, rather than discussing the health aspects.
The supervisors discussed at a Tuesday meeting creating a resolution to ban the use of e cigarettes, also known as electronic smoking devices, inside the county building and on county grounds. Although the product has been called e cigarettes, the supervisors are cautious of changing terminology, which could cause loop holes for smokers of the product.
What I want to get across is we want to cover e cigarettes or anything similar if they call it something else, supervisor Pat Harney said.
E cigarettes are battery operated products that can heat liquid nicotine and produce a vapor users can inhale. Some e cigarettes, however, do not have nicotine in them and have been argued by some proponents of e cigarettes as a way to quit using cigarettes overall.
The supervisors have a zero tolerance policy on the use of tobacco products on county property, passed a few years before the 2008 Clean Air Act. The four supervisors, with the absence of Terrance Neuzil, had some discussion on whether to follow the same guidelines of their no tobacco policy banning the use of e cigarettes both in the county building, as well as the surrounding property.
The big question is do you care when they re outside, supervisor Janelle Rettig said. We need to keep it consistent, and we have a right to say you can t stand there and smoke. I just think if you have one rule for one type of product and another rule for another type of product, no one will know any of the rules.”
Supervisor John Etheridge focused on the possible benefits the electronic smoking device can provide to those looking to quit the habit of smoking.
I personally do not smoke cigarettes, but I know it’s an expensive habit and this is a way to help them give it up, he said. “It still has carcinogens but it’s reduced, so it helps people more or less give up smoking, and this would allow them to do that. It could allow county employees or people permitted to reduce their carcinogen intake.”
The board will wait to see what the Iowa legislature will call e cigarettes before continuing to draft their own resolution, which should be put up to a vote this spring. Andy Chappell, Johnson County assistant county attorney, believed legislature will not discuss banning the product on property and focus on a separate issue.
If something comes out of the state, I can guarantee they are not going to touch on e cigarettes being included in the smoke free air act, Chappell said. They are going to focus more on minors that can sell or buy the product they re not going to touch its use in indoors and outdoors.
He also added if they do call the product e cigarettes and then the terminology is changed later, the supervisors would just need to vote to change the language in their own resolution.
Last month the Iowa House approved a ban to selling e cigarettes to minors. Although some e cigarettes do not have nicotine, members of the Iowa House, believe use of the product could still lead teens to eventually smoke.
While the supervisors disagree on where the e cigarettes would be allowed to be used, Etheridge agrees with the other supervisors that there will be a ban on the use of the product indoors.
“Having a confined space, I’m fine with not allowing that at all,” he said. “But there’s not a lot of research out there about secondhand smoke from e cigarettes and outside, you have carcinogens that can be more easily dispersed, and there are already carcinogens in the air. I think we could look at ways to be a little more flexible.”